Fly within the rules
This page explains what aviation authorities, model-aircraft associations, racing bodies and researchers publish. It is not legal advice and not a substitute for your aviation authority's own rules, a club safety officer or proper training.
Penalties here are described only by type and by the rule that sets them. Amounts, ranges and prison terms are deliberately left out. A sporting sanction from a racing body is not a legal penalty, and the two are kept apart at the end of the page.
United States
What this rests on: an FAA notice read from the Federal Register's public-inspection copy, and statute texts from Cornell's Legal Information Institute. faa.gov could not be opened, so the FAA's enforcement pages were not read.
The FAA's 2026 enforcement changes
- The bulletin: the FAA notice says that on 21 January 2026 the FAA issued FAA Order 2150.3C, Change 13, Compliance and Enforcement Bulletin No. 2026-1. It requires mandatory legal enforcement action for drone operations that endanger the public, violate airspace restrictions or further another crime, and it says most drone violations are no longer eligible for compliance actions.
- The DETER programme: the notice "Settlement Policy for Small Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Cases", scheduled for Federal Register publication on 17 April 2026 (document 2026-07585, covering 14 CFR Parts 48, 61, 89, 91, 107, 135 and 137), announced the Drone Expedited and Targeted Enforcement Response (DETER) Program to speed up and increase enforcement against small drone operators who break FAA regulations.
- Why: the notice says it implements the executive order "Restoring American Airspace Sovereignty" of 6 June 2025, whose section 6 calls for full enforcement of civil and criminal laws when drone operators endanger the public, violate airspace restrictions or use a drone in another crime.
- How it works: eligible first-time individual violators receive a Violation Notice offering a significantly reduced civil penalty or a certificate suspension in exchange for resolving the case within 10 days; the finding of violation is recorded as violation history and the right of appeal is waived. Other cases go through the regular process, which can lead to a Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty, a Notice of Proposed Certificate Action or an Emergency Order of Revocation.
- Where: the FAA says it will apply DETER at locations and times of its choosing, at first where a high volume of drone operations is expected.
The statutes
- 49 U.S.C. 44809(e): the recreational exception does not limit the FAA Administrator's authority to pursue enforcement against anyone, recreational flyers included, who endangers the safety of the national airspace system.
- 18 U.S.C. 39B (added 5 October 2018): a federal crime to fly an unmanned aircraft so as to knowingly or recklessly interfere with or disrupt an occupied aircraft in a way that poses an imminent safety hazard, or knowingly to fly one without authorisation in a runway exclusion zone at an airport with Class B, C or D airspace at the surface. The penalties are a fine, imprisonment or both, increasing where serious bodily injury or death results.
United Kingdom
What this rests on: the CAA's Drone and Model Aircraft Code, CAP2320 (March 2026), the CAA's 2020 Drone Code, and the contents of the Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 on legislation.gov.uk.
- Criminal offences: CAP2320 says many of its rules are legal requirements and that breaking them is a criminal offence. On Remote ID, it says not adding the operator's Remote ID and switching the function on before flying a UK1, UK2 or UK3 aircraft may lead to prosecution.
- Responsibility: the CAA's 2020 Drone Code said legal responsibility for each flight lies with the flyer, that police can track illegal drone flights and trace offenders, and that failing to fly responsibly could lead to criminal prosecution.
- The 2021 Act: Part 3 ("Unmanned aircraft") contains Schedule 8 (powers of police officers and prison authorities), Schedule 9 (police powers relating to the Air Navigation Order 2016 and the Unmanned Aircraft (Offences and Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2025) and Schedule 10 (fixed penalties for certain unmanned aircraft offences).
- Police powers, unconfirmed: a law firm's summary, seen only in search results, says the Act lets police require a drone to be grounded, stop and search people and vehicles, obtain warrants to search premises, and require evidence of pilot competency and operator registration. The schedule text was not read.
- Fixed penalties: which offences are currently designated for fixed penalty notices was not confirmed.
European Union
EU drone rules under Regulation (EU) 2019/947 are applied in each member state by its National Aviation Authority. Enforcement and penalties in the member states were not researched for this site.
Canada
- Transport Canada's release of 9 January 2019 says all drone pilots remain subject to the Criminal Code and to provincial, territorial and municipal laws, that endangering the safety of an aircraft is a serious offence, and that violations can bring penalties that may include imprisonment, for drones of any size and purpose.
- Transport Canada's Aeronautical Information Manual (effective 19 March 2026) says flying at an advertised event without a Special Flight Operations Certificate brings a civil penalty under the Canadian Aviation Regulations (section 3.2.29.2).
- Transport Canada's enforcement and penalty pages were not read.
Australia
CASA's explanatory statement for instrument EX64/24 (registered 21 October 2024) describes flying an unmanned aircraft outside the operator's visual line of sight without a CASA approval as an offence under CASR regulation 101.073. CASA's website timed out throughout the research, so CASA's enforcement approach was not read.
Sporting and association sanctions (not law)
Racing bodies and associations apply their own sanctions at their own events. These are not legal penalties.
- FAI F9U (Volume F9, 2025 edition, effective 1 May 2025; the 2026 edition, effective 1 January or 1 June 2026 by different reports, was not read): penalties up to disqualification from an event for switching on a video transmitter without authorisation, using non-authorised radio equipment, unscheduled flights on the circuit and non-compliant models. Grounds for disqualification from a single race include crossing the safety line, flying after removing the goggles even briefly, celebratory manoeuvres and hazardous piloting (C.9.1).
- MAAA (MOP066, 19 August 2019, section 9.4): switching on a video transmitter on a channel used by a competitor who is racing may get the offender excluded from the event.
For what investigators have recorded about drone occurrences, see incidents and near misses.
Sources
- FAA, Settlement Policy for Small Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Cases, Federal Register public inspection, document 2026-07585
- Cornell LII, 49 U.S.C. 44809
- Cornell LII, 18 U.S.C. 39B
- UK CAA, The Drone and Model Aircraft Code, CAP2320 (March 2026)
- UK CAA, The Drone Code, CAP 2007 (December 2020)
- legislation.gov.uk, Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021, contents
- Law-firm summary of the Air Traffic Management and Unmanned Aircraft Act 2021 (search summary only)
- Transport Canada, news release on new drone safety regulations (9 January 2019)
- Transport Canada, Aeronautical Information Manual, RPA chapter (effective 19 March 2026)
- Federal Register of Legislation, explanatory statement for CASA EX64/24 (21 October 2024)
- Regulation (EU) 2019/947 as adopted (legislation.gov.uk copy)
- FAI Sporting Code Section 4, Volume F9 Drone Sports, 2025 edition (effective 1 May 2025)
- FAI, SC4 volume CIAM F9 Drone sports 2026 (listed; host did not resolve, not read)
- MAAA, MOP066 First Person View (FPV) and Self Guided Model Aircraft Policy, version D (19 August 2019)